Information Centre

World Reports Overview UN & EU sanctions FATF AML High Risk Government Legislation Name FATF AML Deficiency List FATF MER Recommendation International Sanctions Corruption US State ML Assessment Human Trafficking Safe Haven / Supporter of Terrorism Narcotics Financial Transparency Political / Governance Highly Corrupt 0-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-100 Very […]

World Reports Overview

Click + drag for panning
Scroll Wheel to Zoom
Pointer

Name

High Risk
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89
90-100
Lower Risk
Ratings Table Information

Our risk ranking tool has been designed to provide a measure of the money laundering risk of countries that your organisation might have client relationships with or doing business with.

Based upon data collected from many international and government agencies, we have subjectively weighted the findings to provide a free rating tool that is predominantly focused on money laundering and sanctions issues. Please see below our weightings and a list of all data subject sources.

To view the actual score ratings for each indicator you will have to access our Subscription area.

The spreadsheet will be updated as and when changes occur - just check our Updates page for further information.

 Indicator / Sub IndicatorWeighting
1Money laundering/terrorist financing risks
1.1. FATF Uncooperative / AML Deficient
1.2. FATF Compliance with 40+9 Rec
1.3. US State ML Assessment
1.5. US Secretary of State terrorism
56
25
10
15
6
2International sanctions15
3Corruption risks10
4World Governance Indicators3
5Narcotics Major List3
6Human Trafficking3
7EU Tax Blacklist5
8Offshore Finance Centre5
FATF AML List

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is the global standard-setting body for anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT). In order to protect the international financial system from money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT) risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identifies jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

Outcomes FATF Plenary, 22, 24 and 25 February 2021

High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action

High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country. This list is often externally referred to as the “black list”.

  • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Iran
Jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies

Jurisdictions under increased monitoring are actively working with the FATF to address strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing. When the FATF places a jurisdiction under increased monitoring, it means the country has committed to resolve swiftly the identified strategic deficiencies within agreed timeframes and is subject to increased monitoring. This list is often externally referred to as the ‘grey list’.

  • Albania
  • Barbados
  • Botswana
  • Burkina Faso
  • Cambodia
  • Cayman Islands
  • Haiti
  • Jamaica
  • Malta
  • Mauritius
  • Morocco
  • Myanmar
  • Nicaragua
  • Pakistan
  • Panama
  • Philippines
  • Senegal
  • South Sudan
  • Syria
  • Uganda
  • Yemen
  • Zimbabwe

Jurisdiction no longer subject to increased monitoring

  • Ghana
Human Trafficking
Tier 1

Countries whose governments fully meet the Trafficking Victims Protection Act’s (TVPA) minimum standards.

Tier 2

Countries whose governments do not fully meet the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to meet those standards.

Tier 2 Watchlist

Countries whose governments do not fully meet the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to meet those standards.

View Additional Info
Tier 3

Countries whose governments do not fully meet the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so.

Tier 1
  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Belgium
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Czech Republic
  • Estonia
  • Findland
  • France
  • Georgia
  • Guyana
  • South Korea
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Netherlands
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Avenir
  • Taiwan
  • United Kingdom
  • USA
Tier 2
  • Albania
  • Angola
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Armenia
  • Bangladesh
  • Benin
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Cabo Verde
  • Central Africa
  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
  • Cote D’ivoire
  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
  • Denmark
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvarod
  • Eswatini
  • Fiji
  • Gabon
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Greece
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Isreal
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Jamaica
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kyrgyz Republic
  • Kenya
  • Kosovo
  • Kuwait
  • Laos
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Maldives
  • Malta
  • Mauritius
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia
  • Moldova
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • New Zealand
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Nepal
  • North Macedonia
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Qatar
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Lucia
  • St. Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Serbia
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Slovak Republic
  • Solomon Islands
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Switzerland
  • Tajikistan
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • `
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
Tier 2 Watchlist
  • Albania
  • Angola
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Armenia
  • Bangladesh
  • Benin
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Cabo Verde
  • Central Africa
  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
  • Cote D’ivoire
  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
  • Denmark
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvarod
  • Eswatini
  • Fiji
  • Gabon
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Greece
  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iraq
  • Isreal
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Jamaica
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kyrgyz Republic
  • Kenya
  • Kosovo
  • Kuwait
  • Laos
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Maldives
  • Malta
  • Mauritius
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia
  • Moldova
  • Mongolia
  • Montenegro
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • New Zealand
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Nepal
  • North Macedonia
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Panama
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Qatar
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Lucia
  • St. Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Serbia
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Slovak Republic
  • Solomon Islands
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Switzerland
  • Tajikistan
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
Tier 3
  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Belgium
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Czech Republic
  • Estonia
  • Findland
  • France
  • Georgia
  • Guyana
  • South Korea
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Netherlands
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Avenir
  • Taiwan
  • United Kingdom
  • USA
Special Case
  • Libya
  • Somalia
  • Yemen